Welcome to Employment Law Guide
Federal And State Employment Law Applications Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
Labour and Employment Law – the Same or Different?
from:Labour and employment law are often terms used interchangeably. In actual fact, there is a difference between labour and employment law. Labour laws usually deal with employer-union relationships and employment laws with employer-employee relationships. Is this a distinction without a difference? Possibly, unless you happen to deal in labour and employment law on a regular basis and the distinction is important to your business.
Well, for the purposes of this short article, you will be reading about employer-employee relationships in the area of sick leave pay. As you know, most US employers offer sick leave pay. You will find some also offer accrued sick leave pay when employees quit or are laid off. This is mostly used as a benefit to attract and keep employees. However, this is NOT mandated under labour and employment law, it is strictly voluntary.
So great, where does that leave an employee? If an employer does offer sick leave pay, then you are entitled to it – so long as you comply with terms and conditions in related policies or your employment contract. Since this is a totally voluntary benefit, labour and employment law has no effect on this. So basically, it is up to the employer to follow through or not. However, there may be a loophole here should you need one. If company sick leave policy states you need a Doctor's note and the company doesn't consistently apply this to everyone, you may be able to sue.
What about sick leave of your own or a family member? If this sick leave pay is totally voluntary and not governed by labour and employment law where does that leave you? Here you are covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act and may have up to 12 weeks of sick leave for your own or a family member's illness. This is without losing your job or group health benefits. So that's good news.
You may recall that something dubbed the Healthy Americans Act was first introduced in the US Senate in 2005. The idea was to compel employers to provide annual sick leave benefits to workers who logged at least 1,500 hours in a year. That first Act didn't get anywhere and was reborn as the Healthy Americans Act of 2007.
In a nutshell this act (if it passes) would dissolve all employer-based insurance. It would mandate every employer who covered his employees in 2006 convert the total they spent on insurance into salary increases. Whoa what a pay raise that would be! Employers would be legislated to do this, but would want to because every year health costs go up at least 10 percent or more. If the total for employers freezes at 2006 levels, employers would be exempt from 2007's increase. There no indication this Act will pass in 2007.
Federal And State Employment Law Applications Specific links
Federal And State Employment Law Applications News
Manhattan US Attorney Announces Charges Against 10 Additional Long Island ... - Federal Bureau of Investigation (press release)
Manhattan US Attorney Announces Charges Against 10 Additional Long Island ... Federal Bureau of Investigation (press release) Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; Martin J. Dickman, Inspector General of the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB-OIG); Janice K. Fedarcyk, the Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Office of the Federal ... |
Witnessing History: The State Of Labor Law In 2012 - Metropolitan Corporate Counsel
Witnessing History: The State Of Labor Law In 2012 Metropolitan Corporate Counsel No matter where you stand on the issues, it would be hard to deny that 2012 has been an extraordinary period in the arena of labor law. Recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a plethora of litigation, escalating acrimony over ... |
mHealth Stakeholders: Bullet List of Legal Considerations - JD Supra (press release)
mHealth Stakeholders: Bullet List of Legal Considerations JD Supra (press release) Briefly, consider that: Patent rights are protected internationally by filing a first patent application to establish a priority date before the invention is publicly known. In the United States, an applicant has one year to file after a first public ... |
Wonkbook: Obama's gay marriage bump - Washington Post (blog)
Wonkbook: Obama's gay marriage bump Washington Post (blog) Only a handful of the most militant states are likely to continue all-out resistance to federal health reform if the law is upheld -- which ironically would mean the federal government would run their exchanges. But for most states, the likely scenario ... |
May issue bonus: Retail Security background checks - SecurityInfoWatch (blog)
 Human Resources Journal | May issue bonus: Retail Security background checks SecurityInfoWatch (blog) Following up on STE's cover section coverage of retail security, here is some more news for employers in this sector: The federal government has updated the law regarding how certain employers can use criminal background checks in hiring practices. Nixon Peabody | Employers take note: new EEOC guidance on criminal records in ... |